<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rushen Parish Commissioners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rushen-commissioners.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Flower Festival 2008</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/flower-festival-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/flower-festival-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  St Peter&#8217;s Church, Cregneash, Rushen.


  St Peter&#8217;s Church took part in the annual Flower Festival and all the flowers were beautifully displayed. The theme was &#8216;Hope Springs Eternal&#8217; and it was interesting to see how the different people had interpreted it.


The display outside the Church was particularly pertinent to the Village of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>
  St Peter&rsquo;s Church, Cregneash, Rushen.<br />
</h3>
<p>
  St Peter&rsquo;s Church took part in the annual Flower Festival and all the flowers were beautifully displayed. The theme was &lsquo;Hope Springs Eternal&rsquo; and it was interesting to see how the different people had interpreted it.
</p>
<p>
<a style="float:right;" href='http://rushen-commissioners.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/flowerfest08-001-1024.jpg'><img src="http://rushen-commissioners.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/flowerfest08-001-1024-300x225.jpg" alt="A model display depicting an aging thatched Manx cottage with a \&#039;For Sale\&#039; sign in the garden, with the caption \&quot;Hoping for planning permission\&quot;" title="Hoping for planning permission" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-65" /></a>The display outside the Church was particularly pertinent to the Village of Cregneash. This showed a Manx cottage in need of repair with the words &lsquo;Hoping for Planning Permission&rsquo;. It is well nigh impossible to get planning permission for anything other than very minor changes to properties in Cregneash as Manx National Heritage opposes the applications even though it is not a Conservation Area.
</p>
<p>
  The Flower Festival Service on 6<sup>th</sup> July was combined with two Baptisms and the Church was full and overflowing.
</p>
<p>You can see more photos in our <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rushen-commissioners/" title="View our flickr photostream">Flickr feed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/flower-festival-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minutes, Wed 16th April. 2008</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/minutes-wed-16th-april-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/minutes-wed-16th-april-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Minutes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortened Minutes — the full version can be viewed at the Commissioners&#8217; Office.



Minutes
The Minutes of the meeting held 19th March 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read and agreed a true record.

Matters Arising:


Local Authority Elections
Election on 24th April. Mr Ronan had not returned a nomination paper. There were therefore only four nominations at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Shortened Minutes — the full version can be viewed at the Commissioners&#8217; Office.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-63"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Minutes</h3>
<p>The Minutes of the meeting held 19<sup>th</sup> March 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read and agreed a true record.</li>
<li>
<h3>Matters Arising:</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>Local Authority Elections</h4>
<p><strong>Election on 24<sup>th</sup> April.</strong> Mr Ronan had not returned a nomination paper. There were therefore only four nominations at the time for closure of acceptances. These were Mr Derek Harold Cain, Glendown Farm, Truggan Road, Mr Peter Gordon Gunn, Fleshwick House, Fleshwick, Mr Adrian Tinkler, Dhoon Rushen Surby Road and Mr Peter John Vernon, Kincroft, Surby Road. As the election was therefore un-contested the candidates were confirmed as elected. They were to serve a term of four years commencing on 1<sup>st</sup> May 2008.</p>
<p><strong>Election on 8<sup>th</sup> May 2008.</strong> As there was a vacancy on the Board there would have to be a further Election and this was to be on 8<sup>th</sup> May 2008.<br />
The Clerk had put up the necessary posters and notice in the Isle of Man Courier.<br />
There had been four nomination forms taken out and three returned correctly completed, one person having subsequently informed the Clerk that he would not be seeking nomination.</p>
<p>As there were three nominations for the one seat the Election would take place on 8<sup>th</sup> May. In a ‘by-election’ it would usually be the Chairman who would be the Returning Officer. Mr Cain, however, had declined as he did not have enough time to do it. He had therefore delegated the duties to the Clerk, which she had agreed to do, as well as the Clerk&#8217;s duties for the Election.</li>
<li>
<h4>Waste Management and Refuse Collection</h4>
<p>The new wheelie bins had not yet arrived but the Clerk explained that Schaeffers had a very long delivery time. Mr Cain had read through the MEA Contract and brought the Health and Safety aspect included in that to the attention of the Board.</li>
<li>
<h4>Southern Area Plan</h4>
<p>RPC&#8217;s submission had been sent in and all Members had been emailed a copy for approval before submission.</p>
<p>A letter had been received from Southern Nomads regarding Ballakilley land and the Southern Area Plan. All Members had been given a copy. The contents were noted.</p>
<p>Letter from Mrs L E Kelly, Port St Mary — recommending that no more building should be allowed above Surby Bridge. This was read out and the contents noted.</p>
<p>Letter from Mr &amp; Mrs Buchleitner, Viking Close. All Members had been given a copy. They were in agreement with some of the points made.</li>
<li>
<h4>National Heritage Area</h4>
<p>It was still not clear whether this would be going ahead or was it waiting for the Southern Area Plan. Although it had been said that DAFF would be in charge of it it would seem that this was not confirmed. Mr Ronan said that it was not definite that DAFF would be in charge but it was included in their Plan. However, there was no movement.</li>
<li>
<h4>MNH</h4>
<p>Rubbish in the cove below the Thousla Cross. The Clerk had written to MNH asking permission to take rubbish away once Mr Vernon had collected it. No reply received.<br />
If Mr Vernon was unable to carry out the collection it was to be left and Southern Nomads would be asked if they could do it.</li>
<li>
<h4>Lighting</h4>
<p><strong>Cregneash lights</strong> — the new tops were on and looked more appropriate than the previous ones. No invoice received yet.</p>
<p><strong>MEA — new Contract received — in force from 1<sup>st</sup> April 08 to 31<sup>st</sup> March 09.</strong></p>
<p>Maintenance costs had increased by ‘a mere 3%’. Unit cost ‘has been kept to a minimum due to the MEA’s forward energy buying policy’</p>
<h4>Pricing Schedule</h4>
<p>The current unit cost of energy is 11.54 pence per unit, plus the fuel cost adjustment and VAT as applicable at the time of invoice. The MEA calculate energy consumption based on the number and type of streetlights, the lighting regime and wattage in use at the time of invoice.</p>
<p>The maintenance charge per lamp, per 3 month period to be £6.90 per installation.<br />
The maintenance charge per clock, per 3 month period to be £2.14 per installation.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>23 clocks @ £2.14</td>
<td class="currency">£49.22 plus VAT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>133 lights @ £6.90</td>
<td class="currency">£917.70 plus VAT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td class="currency"><strong>£966.93 plus VAT per 3 months.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Specification of Services</h4>
<p>Maintenance fee includes:-</p>
<ol>
<li>Monthly visits to inspect public lights controlled by clocks.</li>
<li>Repairs to faulty lights either identified during inspection visits or reported by the public or local authority within 14 days although the MEA will use reasonable endeavour to make repairs as rapidly as possible on a priority basis.</li>
<li>Replacement of faulty electrical components that make up the lighting installation as follows — lamps, ballasts, photo cell units, time clocks, fuses, capacitors.</li>
<li>The painting of columns <strong>as deemed necessary to maintain standard integrity</strong></li>
<li id="cross-ref-1">The maintenance of brackets and supports where lamps are installed on MEA poles or wall mounted, including painting where required to maintain standard integrity.</li>
<li>Maintenance and repair of MEA supply equipment within streetlight pillars.</li>
<li>Maintenance of and updates to the MEA streetlight database.</li>
</ol>
<p>The maintenance agreement <strong>does not</strong> cover:-</p>
<ol>
<li>lighting column replacement and street lantern repair either due to corrosion, wear, environmental damage or other third party damage or negligence.</li>
<li>wooden pole mounted bracket arms or supports <a href="#cross-ref-1">see (5) above</a></li>
<li>repairs to non-MEA street lighting cables due to third party damage or faults, unless the cable forms part of the MEA mains cable network.</li>
<li>repairs or replacement of non-MEA streetlight pillars.</li>
<li>fully automatic photo-cell controlled lights will not be subject to the monthly inspection but will be maintained as required.</li>
</ol>
<p>The MEA use a limited range of columns and lanterns in order to minimise costs, if local authorities wish to change the pattern of any items of equipment this will require special ordering arrangements and will attract additional costs for installation and delays in receiving replacements for third party damage.</p>
<h4>Rates for Streetlight Works: (all plus Vat)</h4>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Replacement clock</td>
<td class="currency">£170</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement fitting</td>
<td class="currency">£390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement pole mounted arm and fitting</td>
<td class="currency">£550</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement pole mounted arm and fitting &amp; clock</td>
<td class="currency">£715</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pillar transfer (Authority)</td>
<td class="currency">£450</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement 5/6m column</td>
<td class="currency">£2,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement 8m column</td>
<td class="currency">£3,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Replacement 10m column</td>
<td class="currency">£3,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Period column</td>
<td class="currency">£3,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5/6m folding replacement column</td>
<td class="currency">£3,250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8m folding replacement column</td>
<td class="currency">£3,500</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The columns and fittings allowed are as MEA standard i.e. Urbis ZX range fittings and British steel/Corus standard columns.</p>
<p>MEA propose to install due to Health and Safety reasons, base hinged (folding) new or replacement columns as required where access via a mobile elevated working platform is not achievable.’</p>
<p>Members felt that the cost were high but that, as there was no alternative, the Contract would have to be agreed and signed.</p>
<p>The Chairman and Clerk duly signed it for return to the MEA.</p>
<p><strong>New light at Rushen Church?</strong> Mr Cain had pointed out that there was no streetlight outside the Parish Church and that perhaps there should be. Members agreed and the Clerk was to write to the Vicar to ask if she would have any objections. If she had no objections the Clerk was to go ahead and ask for a price from MEA.</p>
<p><strong>Solar lights</strong> — Mr Tinkler had attended a meeting at which Mr Rimington had spoken. This was with regard to solar lighting and had been interesting.</li>
<li>
<h4>Southern Civic Amenity Site</h4>
<p>The Clerk had asked the Clerk of the Site for some items of information for RPC&#8217;s web site. She had supplied some which Nick Thornley was to put on the web site.</p>
<p>Mr Cain had not been able to attend the last meeting but he reported that the Board was getting an accountant to help with their accounts.</li>
<li>
<h4>Traffic</h4>
<p>Junction of Garth Ave. and Mill Road. Mr Cain had reported that there had been an accident there and a lady was knocked off her scooter — there was no stop sign at the junction. The Clerk had reported this to Hazel Fletcher of DoT who had asked one the DoT officers to go and have a look.</li>
<li>
<h4>Department of Transport</h4>
<p>There had been nothing further on Plantation Hill nor the road widening at Glen Chass.</li>
<li>
<h4>Police</h4>
<p>There had been a meeting on 3rd and Mr Vernon had attended. Mr Vernon reported that all seemed to be quiet in the area at the moment. A copy of the Southern Neighbourhood Policing — ‘Overall Policing Style’ had been received and copied to all Members. It was the general opinion that those involved wanted to keep the group meetings.</li>
<li>
<h4>Litter, Dog Fouling, Fly Tipping, Beach Cleaning</h4>
<p>There was to be a beach clean by pupils of CRHS on Sat. 19th. Mr Ronan had been liaising with Mr Dunn and would be going along to help. He would collect the bags and gloves from the Clerk. Mr Kelly was to collect the bags of rubbish and take them to the Amenity Site.</p>
<p>There had reports of small bottles of chemicals washed up on Port Erin shore and the Coastguards were looking for more on other beaches including Fleshwick. The CRHS pupils were to be warned not to touch any of these if they found them.</p>
<p>Nomads SportErin had agreed to carry out a beach-clean. They would like to combine it with a BBQ to encourage their Members to come along. The Clerk had asked them would they be able to clear high banks, such as Fleshwick. It was agreed that the Clerk would liaise with them.</p>
<p>Fleshwick — Mel Wright, reporter from IOM Newspapers, had contacted the Clerk regarding Fleshwick beach — a woman had phoned her saying that the shore was a disgrace — rubbish all over it and 4 dead sheep; no litter bins either. The Clerk had informed Mrs Wright that RPC have the beach cleared and that, when they had bins there before they had either been set on fire or wrecked by cars. Also that Southern Nomads would be clearing the beach and brooghs and stream for RPC before the season.</li>
<li>
<h4>Ballafesson Playing Field</h4>
<p>Lease. Mr David Radcliffe had signed the Lease but his brother, John, had been off the Island. Mr Gunn would take it to him for signing when he returned.</li>
<li>
<h4>Croit-e-Caley and The Level</h4>
<p>Hartford Homes — see ‘other planning matters’</p>
<p>Level Garage site — this was progressing with the footings in and up to ground level.</li>
<li>
<h4>Car Park, The Howe</h4>
<p>Letter from IOM Water Authority 19<sup>th</sup> March.</p>
<blockquote><p>I write further to your letter of 5<sup>th</sup> December in which you state that the Commissioners would be interested in leasing an area of land from the Authority in order to be able to construct an extension to their existing car park at the Howe. I can now advise that the Water Authority Board has considered your request and agreed that subject to planning approval and an agreed rental figure which would provided by the Government Valuer, a lease could be offered to the Commissioners on the following basis.</p>
<ol>
<li>An area of land at the Howe Service Reservoir to be agreed;</li>
<li>The lease to be renewed on an annual basis with the inclusion of a reserve contingency which would allow the Authority to be able to give 2 months notice of intent for the return of the land should it be required by the Authority to carry out its water undertaking.</li>
<li>All costs associated with the car park including construction, maintenance and legal fees to be borne by the Commissioners.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>This matter was discussed and it seemed, at the moment, the car park was not as full as it used to be. The need for an extension was to be re-considered in light of this and the Clerk was to bring to the next meeting details of the costings which had arisen when the car park was originally made.</li>
<li>
<h4>Hedges and Verges</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Municipal Association</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Southern Swimming Pool</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Southern Health Committee</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Rushen Ambulance Committee</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Marashen Crescent Housing</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Secret Gardens in Rushen.</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Contract of Employment</h4>
<p>Mr Tinkler said that this should be dealt with in Private Session and this was agreed.</li>
<li>
<h4>Web Site</h4>
<p>This was now ‘live’ and more things were required to go on it. The Clerk had been sending quite a bit of information to Nick Thornley but still had to do the bits and pieces from the Minute Book from 1894 — the first year of local authorities.</li>
<li>
<h4>Mobile Phone Coverage in Cregneash and Sound.</h4>
<p>The Clerk had written to Manx Telecom asking what they were doing about mobile phone coverage in the Cregneash and Sound area. 7<sup>th</sup> April — Graham Shimmin replied — “We agree with the sentiments of the Commissioners regarding mobile coverage at The Sound and in the wider Cregneash area. In conjunction with Manx National Heritage we are actively progressing an initiative to resolve this requirement. The aim is to address both the Sound café and the broader area. Given the environmental importance and sensitivity surrounding this area it requires a level of consideration and discussion over and above that normally required. Good progress is being made but we have not yet reached the stage where a mutually acceptable solution has been agreed. Unfortunately we are not able to provide you with a timescale when agreement will be reached and a solution put in place. However, we are confident that the progress to date will result in a resolution of the problem.”</p>
<p>The Clerk gave Members a brief reminder of previous requests by RPC over this matter.</p>
<p>RPC wrote to Manx Telecom in <strong>September 2003</strong> with their concerns about lack of mobile phone coverage. Also to Minister of Tourism regarding the Walking Festival in 2004.<br />
Manx Telecom said that they had no plans to provide masts in the area and RPC suggested they install a public phone box or even an emergency phone. They replied that a new payphone would cost £2,000+ and an emergency phone, with 3 numbers only — would cost £492 36. This would be plus installation, line rental, etc. They would not foot any of the costs.<br />
In October 2003 RPC wrote to MNH indicating their concerns and that they had been in touch with Manx Telecom and giving them the costings. The Customer Services at Telecom had said they would be contacting MNH abut the possibility of siting a mast somewhere in the area and RPC wrote to MNH suggesting that they get in touch with Telecom with regard to finding a suitable site for a mast without compromising the integrity of the area but also to ‘move with the times’ as far as providing phone cover in case there should be an emergency.<br />
Nothing was done and RPC contacted Manx Telecom again in July 2004 when Telecom said they were taking away the payphone in Howe Road/Glen Chass.</p>
<p>Manx Telecom replied that one of the biggest objectors to any new mobile masts/poles is MNH. They and approached MNH then the Sound Café was being redeveloped to see whether a micro-cell could be included in the design but they did not get a response. MNH had objected to various planning applications regarding masts on the west coast area (Dalby). Manx Telecom said they would be interested in revisiting potential coverage in the Sound area, however, with the current MNH policy on any new masts they believed that it would be a waste of everyone’s time. The existing beacon at Cronk ny Arrey (which RPC had suggested may be used) had been investigated but ruled out as it would not provide coverage at The Sound. They pointed out that it is important to note that even where mobile coverage is provided coastal footpaths are often below the cliff line so full coverage can never be guaranteed.</p>
<p>That was nearly four years previously and still MNH had ‘not yet reached the stage where a mutually acceptable solution has been agreed’.</p>
<p>Mr Cain said that he would contact Mr Shimmin.<br />
It was agreed to write again in another month.</li>
<li>
<h4>Postal Addresses in Rushen</h4>
<p>Ballakillowey and Lhingague.<br />
The sign for Ballakillowey Estate only indicated ‘Ballakillowey’ — not that it was an estate nor the names of any of the roads in it. The Clerk was to get a quote from Colas for a sign saying Ballakillowey Estate and naming the six roads within it.<br />
Once the new sign was up the ‘Ballakillowey’ sign could be moved to a more appropriate place.</li>
<li>
<h4>Commemoration of the wreck of the Jeune St Charles — 8<sup>th</sup> April</h4>
<p>This had been successful, with about 35 people attending. Mr Cain had given a short speed about the wreck and the subsequent rescue an laid the wreath on the Thousla Cross. Those attending were invited to go into the Café where RPC would pay for tea or coffee for them.<br />
The Clerk had purchased a silk wreath rather than one of fresh flowers as the wind and salt air would have withered fresh ones very quickly. She had had a reprint of the Thousla Cross Booklets done at Quine &amp; Cubbon. These were given away on the day and some were put into the Café for people to take if they wished. A sign had been put on the Cross giving a little information and that the booklets were available in the Café and donations could be made to the Lifeboat fund if wished.</p>
<p>A letter of thanks had been received from Wynne Keig who had enjoyed the Ceremony and the Booklets which had been given out.<br />
The booklets cost £45 for 100. The silk wreath cost £40. The coffee cost £40 65.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Revenue</h4>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Rents</td>
<td class="currency">£1,118.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rushen School — extra refuse collections</td>
<td class="currency">£366.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irvings — collection &amp; disposal Sound</td>
<td class="currency">£1,128.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shore Hotel — refuse disposal</td>
<td class="currency">£427.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Searches</td>
<td class="currency">£30.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Accounts for Payment</h4>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Jones Services</td>
<td class="currency">£2,171.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clerk’s salary</td>
<td class="currency">£750.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MEA — consumption 17/12 — 26/03</td>
<td class="currency">£1,032.91<br />
(paid before year end)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MEA — maintenance Jan Feb Mar</td>
<td class="currency">£1,095.38<br />
(paid before year end)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NI 6/10–5/4</td>
<td class="currency">£242.40<br />
(paid before year end)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DoLGE — refuse disposal March</td>
<td class="currency">£1,125.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IOM Newspapers — one advert 2nd Election</td>
<td class="currency">£607.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elaine&#8217;s Flowers,silk wreath for Thousla Cross</td>
<td class="currency">£40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Q &amp; C — 100 Thousla booklets</td>
<td class="currency">£45.00<br />
(no vat)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manx Telecom — phone 1 month</td>
<td class="currency">£48.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irvings — Sound Café coffee at Commemoration</td>
<td class="currency">£40.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Non contested election — G Kelly — Clerk</td>
<td class="currency">£64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Non contested election — G Kelly — Returning Officer</td>
<td class="currency">£64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">(these amounts were the new fees payable to Election staff)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rates — 1-4 Reayrt y Cronk</td>
<td class="currency">£1,533.80<br />
(Rent a/c)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">(not due until June)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>These accounts were approved for payment, with the exception of the Rates which were not due until June.</li>
<li>
<h4>Financial Situation</h4>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>General current account</td>
<td class="currency">£1,000.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Liquidity</td>
<td class="currency">£45,945.84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fixed Term</td>
<td class="currency">£32,851.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent current</td>
<td class="currency">£8,959.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Housing Maintenance</td>
<td class="currency">£2,565.54</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Clerk had brought a letter giving RPC&#8217;s instructions for the standing orders for Jones Services and the Clerk’s salary to be increased - :- Jones Services to be increased to £2,302 pcm, including VAT; Mrs Kelly £698.67 pcm. The Chairman duly signed the letter for posting to the IOM Bank.</li>
<li>
<h4>Correspondence</h4>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>1<sup>st</sup> Supplemental List</h4>
<p>Noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Departmental/Board/Office Service Delivery Plans 2008</h4>
<p>Plans for each Department, etc received — 1 copy of each. Also available on the Government Website.</li>
<li>
<h4>Education (Miscellanious Provisions) Bill 2008</h4>
<p>Copy received — consultation period to be16th May. Comments welcomed. All Members had been given a copy of this. Members could reply to this individually if they wished.</li>
<li>
<h4>KIMO — The Economic Impacts of Marine Litter on Coastal Communities</h4>
<p>Questionnaire emailed from DoLGE. The Clerk had copied this email to all Members.</li>
<li>
<h4>Golden Jubilee Trust</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Committee — Report</h4>
<p>Noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Living and Working on the Island</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Road Transport Licensing Committee</h4>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Road closure — Sloc Hill Climb. 18<sup>th</sup> April</h4>
<p>Noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Douglas Corporation — Invitation.</h4>
<p>Invitation to Clerk and Chairman ‘for drinks in the Mayor’s Parlour, 6 30pm Friday 9<sup>th</sup> May.<br />
RSVP. Mr Cain and the Clerk indicated they would attend.</li>
<li>
<h4>Highways Monthly</h4>
<p>Noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Tynwald Garden Party — 6<sup>th</sup> July</h4>
<p>Invitation for a representative and guest to attend the Garden Party at 3pm on Sunday 6<sup>th</sup> July at The Nunnery.<br />
It was agreed to wait until after the Election so that the new Member could have the opportunity of attending.</li>
<li>
<h4>Permaculture Association</h4>
<p>Questionnaire about provision of allotments. There were no allotments in Rushen.</li>
<li>
<h4>Upper Scard Farmhouse and Holiday Cottages</h4>
<p>Letter from Mr &amp; Mrs Curry.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Applications</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>08/0530. 7 Viking Close, Ballakillowey</h4>
<p><strong>Sunset Ltd.</strong> Alterations and extension to provide additional living accommodation.<br />
The Clerk had visited the site and reported that the proposed ‘garage extension’ seemed to already be partly built and that the yellow notice was nowhere to be seen. She had spoken to one of the workmen about it.<br />
Members felt that the proposed conservatory on two sides of the building was large and very close to the boundary and would be unneighbourly. The construction of the extension without permission was to be pointed out to the planners.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/0108. Upper Kirkill, Ballakillowey Road</h4>
<p><strong>Mr &amp; Mrs Berry. Amended Plan.</strong> Erection of a replacement dwelling. New ridge height to be 300mm higher than the existing property and showing the garden room omitted from the ground floor plan.<br />
No objections.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/0580. Building alongside Shore Hotel, Bay ny Carrickey</h4>
<p><strong>Mrs Rathbone-Scott.</strong> Conversion of existing building, formerly used as a shop and store, now no longer viable into tourist accommodation with longer lets in winter.<br />
Although not objecting to the conversion there was concern about car parking. It was not known whether the same person owned the Shore Hotel and would permit parking in that car park.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/0680. Glen view, Glen Chass</h4>
<p><strong>H W Harness.</strong> Relocate a summer house from the eastern side of the property to the western side. No objections.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/0636. Leander Cottage, Croit-e-Caley</h4>
<p>Mrs Worthington. Erection of replacement porch.<br />
No objections.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Approvals</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>08/075. Heavensgate, Ballakilpheric Road</h4>
<p><strong>Mr &amp; Mrs P Metcalfe.</strong> Alterations and erection of extension (comprising an amendment to the development refused under PA 07/2118) Usual conditions. Decision — Senior Planning Officer. Issued 27<sup>th</sup> March 2008.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/098. Saddle Stones, Mount Gawne Road</h4>
<p><strong>Mr &amp; Mrs G Woodward.</strong> Alterations and erection of extensions.<br />
Usual conditions. Decision — Senior Planning Officer. Issued 28<sup>th</sup> March 2008.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/027. Newhaven, Shore Road</h4>
<p><strong>New Haven Properties Ltd.</strong> Erection of a block of four apartments — amendment comprising addition of two balconies on rear elevation.<br />
Decision — Director of Planning. Issued 7<sup>th</sup> April 2008.</li>
<li>
<h4>08/0065. Mona Rushen Rechabite Hall, The Level</h4>
<p><strong>Mr &amp; Mrs Goldsmith.</strong> Alterations, erection of extension to side elevation, creation of dormer windows, roof lights, windows and door and erection of a replacement detached garage.</p>
<p>Usual conditions. Decision — Senior Planning Officer. Issued 10<sup>th</sup> April 2008.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Refusals</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>08/0207. Field 414367, Surby Road, Surby</h4>
<p><strong>Mrs C A Williams.</strong> Approval in Principle to erect a detached dwelling.<br />
Reason for refusal — 1. The erection of a dwelling on this site would represent an unwarranted development in the Island’s countryside and would be contrary to both the land use provisions of the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982 and to the provisions of the Island Strategic Plan, in particular to the Strategic Aim, Strategic Policies 1c, 2 and 10 Spatial Policy 5, General Policy 3, Environment Policy 1 and Housing Policy 4. The development would also be contrary to the provisions of the provisions of the Arbory and East Rushen Local Plan, particularly policies RES/P/1 and ENC/P1.<br />
Decision — Senior Planning Officer. Issued 7<sup>th</sup> April 2008.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Completion Certificates</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>Folly Cottage, Surby</h4>
<p>Mr &amp; Mrs Greenhalgh. Extension to existing garage.<br />
(Sent to Port Erin Comms as postal address is Port Erin.)</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Other Planning Matters</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>Hartford Homes — new house at Croit-e-Caley</h4>
<p>There had been complaints from residents regarding the state of the site, that nothing had been done for 5 months and that rubbish had been brought from other sites and burnt and there was vermin running about. They also sent photographs.<br />
The Clerk contacted Building Control to see if they knew what was happening (25th March) Mr Rowaichi replied that he would contact Environmental Health regarding the burning and vermin. He also said that ‘the reason for inactivity on site is due to a technical problem caused by bad materials delivered and used in the construction of the building without the knowledge of the developer and the developer has decided in this case to remove what is built and start again in place of merely replacing bad parts. There may be contractual problems that need to be resolved before works could start on site again and I shall inform you as soon as we are advised that works are restarting on site.’</p>
<p>Mr Greenhalgh, the Developer, wrote on 28<sup>th</sup> March — ‘As you may be aware our construction project has been dormant for the last five months. Works are due to recommence in the next month to take the building to completion and then sale. We apologise for any inconvenience that these delays have caused but can assure you that they have been unavoidable.’<br />
The Clerk pointed out that there was no mention of taking the building down and starting again — work had recommenced. She wrote again and received a reply: ‘Thank you for your letter dated 7<sup>th</sup> April which is noted. I can advise that majority of the defective materials have already been removed from the site in the last week but this work is still ongoing. All works are under the supervision of the Building Control Department, NHBC and their Engineers along with our own Structural Engineers Messrs Burrough Stewart. The completed dwelling will be to the same exacting standard and specification that all our dwellings are constructed to and will benefit from a full 10 year NHBC Guarantee.’ James Greenhalgh.<br />
This was noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Rose Lea, Viking Close, Ballakillowey</h4>
<p>Copy of letter from <strong>Planning Enforcement Officer</strong> to the owner of Rose Lea.<br />
‘Further to my visit on 8<sup>th</sup> April 2008 I confirm that planning approval is required for the decking and have enclosed the forms, etc you will need. The application, being retrospective, should be received before 10<sup>th</sup> May.<br />
Noted.</li>
<li>
<h4>Walton Cottage, Ballakillowey</h4>
<p>The planning application for extensions was approved and the footings are in. RPC submitted that they had no objections but noted that there was no application for a garage or stables and presumably they would be the subject of further applications. The application was approved by the Senior Planning Officer. The Clerk reported that there was now a garage being built there under ‘permitted development’ (no application required for a garage of a certain size). She had been to the site and spoken with Mr Georgiou who says that he had spoken to someone in the planning office who has said that he could do that. This seemed to be flagrant flouting of planning as it was possible he could have been turned down if he had included a garage on his plans. Although nothing could be done about it the planners were to be written to point out that with a property so visible as this one any applications for garages, sheds, etc should require a further planning application being submitted.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Any Other Business</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h4>Notice Board</h4>
<p>The Clerk had received a catalogue from Glasdon UK (who make waste bins, shelters, seats, etc) They also sell notice boards and she had got prices for these in case Members agreed to look into replacing the old notice board.<br />
The provision of a new notice board was discussed with members having differing views. It was to be left to the next meeting.</li>
<li>
<h4>Signs</h4>
<p>The sign for Viking Close, Ballakillowey was off the poles and just propped up against the hedge. The Clerk reported that the poles were rusted away and broken (probably because of the bushes). Although the sign was intact it was rotten at the back and needed renewing and new poles. These would have to be put back in the bushes again.<br />
Mr Vernon said he would approach the owners of the property to see if a new sign could be put there and if they could cut back the bushes to enable that.</li>
<li>
<h4>Sandbags at Reayrt y Cronk</h4>
<p>Mr Vernon had arranged for the sandbags, which had been put there when the road was badly flooded, to be taken away as they were causing problems on the pavement.</li>
<li>
<h4>Responsible Finance Officer</h4>
<p>As Mr Ronan would no longer be a Member of the Board after 30<sup>th</sup> April, and he had been the Responsible Finance Officer for the past year, the duty would have to be taken by someone else. The Clerk said that she would now take it back and would get assistance with the accounts.</li>
<li>
<h4>Mr David Ronan</h4>
<p>As Mr Ronan would no longer be a Member of the Board, having completed the four year term, the Chairman thanked him for serving the Commissioners so well, being financially able and a great help to the Board and the Clerk, taking on many tasks. Both he and the Members were disappointed that he had stood down and also that he would not be seeing the swimming pool extensions come to fruition as he had had a lot of input into that project.<br />
The sincere thanks of the Members and Clerk were given to him.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Date of Next Meeting</h3>
<p>Due to the Election on 8<sup>th</sup> it was felt that the meeting should be brought forward so that the new Member could attend his/her first meeting as soon as possible. The next meeting would therefore be on 14<sup>th</sup> May.</p>
<p>As there was no further business the Meeting closed at 9 30pm.</p>
<p>As Ms Williams could not be present for the Private part of the Meeting she left, after thanking the Members.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/24/minutes-wed-16th-april-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minutes, Wed 19th March. 2008</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/17/minutes-wed-19th-march-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/17/minutes-wed-19th-march-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Minutes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minutes of the Meeting held Wed. 27th February 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read.  Mr Cain requested that a slight amendment be made to &#8216;2 r)&#8217; Ballafesson Road, Ballachurry.  To be amended to &#8216;car parking&#8217; and not &#8216;the problems which could arise&#8217;. The amendment was made and the Minutes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Minutes of the Meeting held Wed. 27<sup>th</sup> February 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read.  Mr Cain requested that a slight amendment be made to &lsquo;2 r)&rsquo; Ballafesson Road, Ballachurry.  To be amended to &lsquo;car parking&rsquo; and not &lsquo;the problems which could arise&rsquo;. The amendment was made and the Minutes were agreed a true record.</p>
<p><span id="more-61"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Matters Arising:</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Local Authority Elections</h3>
<p>Nomination Notices were put up in the Parish on 13th.  DoLGE had placed notices covering all Local Authorities in The Courier and the Examiner.</p>
<p>The Clerk had written to the CEO of IOM Post regarding their requirements for Local Authorities to have &lsquo;two trade references&rsquo; before they would open an account.  She pointed out that LAs had been in existence for over 100 years and that Members were surprised and shocked that an organisation such as the Post Office should require this.  Also that RPC would not therefore open an account but would pay by cheque upon receipt of an invoice.  The Clerk had subsequently received notification that DoLGE would provide the reference.  She pointed out again that they seemed to be missing the point &ndash; a Local Authority should not need a reference. However, she had completed the form so that an invoice for payment could be sent should there be an election.</p>
<p>Phil Gawne MHK was to hold a candidates meeting at 7 30pm on 26<sup>th</sup> March at Ballafesson Hall.  He was trying to encourage people to stand and also giving his views on how he thought the Southern Local Authorities should work together.  Members said they may attend.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Waste Management and Refuse Collection</h3>
<p><strong>New wheelie bins:</strong> Nothing yet.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Area Plan including Ballakilley Land</h3>
<p>A submission to be sent to Ian McCauley regarding this on similar lines to what had been typed out for discussion at the meeting.  It was felt important to make clear about how the National Heritage Area should be run and, possibly to have Cregneash Village and the land on the Peninsula treated separately. Mr Gunn suggested the possibility of the land being a National Park and be separate from the Village.   RPC must have involvement in the running of it.</p>
<p>The Clerk was to type out a further submission and send to Members before forwarding to Mr McCauley.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>National Heritage Area</h3>
<p>see above.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>MNH</h3>
<p>nothing at present.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Street lighting at Cregneash</h3>
<p>The Clerk had contacted the MEA again and there had been a delay on getting the fittings but they were going to chase it up.  The Clerk had told Mr Gilbertson that RPC would have liked them up before Easter.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>MEA street lighting</h3>
<p>The Clerk had asked for an explanation on the difference in price between the light fittings on Mount Gawne Road and Croit-e-Caley.  Someone from MEA had contacted the Clerk and they would send a breakdown of the costs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Civic Amenity Site</h3>
<p>Mr Cain reported that two of the operatives who should be working on the Eastern Amenity Site, which was at the moment being run by &lsquo;Tel&rsquo;s&rsquo;,  had come down to the Southern Site to help out.  Their wages were not coming from the Southern Site Board.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Traffic</h3>
<p>nothing at present.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>DoT</h3>
<p>There had been nothing further about the requested pavement at <strong>Plantation Hill</strong>.  Mr Cain reported that some of the residents were to take photographs of the children walking down the road to show the problem.</p>
<p><strong>Glen Chass</strong> &mdash; there had been nothing further from Jim Davidson, DoT, regarding the proposed widening of the corner.</p>
<p><strong>Surby Road</strong> &mdash;  the Clerk had written to Mr &amp; Mrs Felton asking of they could clear the drain in their field to stop the water flooding onto the road.  There had been no reply and it was not known if the work had been done.</p>
<p><strong>Qualtrough&rsquo;s Lane</strong> &mdash;  Mr Vernon reported that, where the DoT had been carrying out work, the road way was collapsing in places.  The Clerk was to report this to DoT.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Police</h3>
<p>There were no issues to be brought up at the next meeting.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Litter, dog fouling, fly tipping, beach cleaning</h3>
<p>Mr Ronan had been in touch with Mr Dunn from CRHS  and they had decided that 19<sup>th</sup> April would be a suitable day to clear Bay ny Carrickey.  They would start at 7 45am.</p>
<p>The Clerk would order bags.   Mr Kelly would remove the rubbish to the Amenity Site.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Ballafesson Playing Field</h3>
<p><strong>Lease</strong> &mdash; Mr Gunn had not seen either John or David Radcliffe yet but hoped to over the weekend.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Croit-e-Caley, The Level</h3>
<p>Nothing further at present.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Car Park, The Howe</h3>
<p>There had been no reply from the IOM Water Authority to the proposal that RPC take out a lease for the required amount of land to extend the car park.  The Clerk was to phone them to ask what was happening.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Hedges and Verges </h3>
<p>Mr Vernon was to send the documents regarding his problems with the neighbour&rsquo;s hedge to DoLGE.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Municipal Association</h3>
<p>Mr Gunn had attended the February Meeting.  The Association was trying to get more Local Authorities to become Members.  He would be attended the March meeting the following week.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Swimming  Pool</h3>
<p>Mr Ronan was not present so there was no report.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Health Committee</h3>
<p>Mr Tinkler said that there was nothing to report other than that the signed Minutes of the Committee would be circulated to all Clerks.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Rushen Ambulance Committee</h3>
<p>Mr Vernon had the Minutes of their last meeting.  He reported that the First Responders were now all sorted and they were covered by St John Ambulance insurance if they were called out, but if called out by the Ambulance Service then they would be covered by that insurance.  The Rushen Emergency Ambulance Committee would be able to retain all their funds.  A letter to be sent to the Committee stating that RPC were glad that the situation had come to fruition and the First Responders were in place.   They offered their support.</p>
<p>Mr Tinkler said that Mr Vernon should take some credit for moving the situation on so that it was resolved. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Marashen Crescent Housing</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Secret Gardens in Rushen</h3>
<p>There was nothing further on this.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Housing Consultative Conference</h3>
<p>Mr Vernon gave a report.  There was to be a meeting of Local Authorities after the elections.  This would be to discuss different rent structure and would be after the elections.  It was considered there may be problems with means-testing.  There were two legal people there who spoke on the legal aspects of tenancy. </p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Contract of Employment</h3>
<p>Mr Tinkler had looked at the Clerk&rsquo;s current Contract and said that it should at least be updated with regard to the age.  He was to get a draft of a part-time contract and bring it to the next meeting.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Revenue</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Rents</td>
<td class="currency">1,118  23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Searches</td>
<td class="currency">60  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shore Hotel (overdue a/c)large w/bin<br />and refuse disposal</td>
<td class="currency">587  80  (inc vat) </td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Accounts for Payment</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Jones Services</td>
<td class="currency">2,171  71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clerk&rsquo;s salary</td>
<td class="currency">750  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MEA &ndash; light at Mount Gawne Road</td>
<td class="currency">644  84   (paid and queried)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DoLGE &ndash; refuse disposal Feb</td>
<td class="currency">1,216  35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manx Telecom</td>
<td class="currency">37  77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Arbory Commissioners 2 w/bins</td>
<td class="currency">82  25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Viking Direct &ndash; minute book, folders</td>
<td class="currency">59  28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Information Systems Div. Poll Cards<br />(paper only &ndash; no charge for printing)</td>
<td class="currency">40  36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Postage  19<sup>th</sup> Sept. &ndash; 14<sup>th</sup> March</td>
<td class="currency">40  91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clerk&rsquo;s mileage May 07- March 08</td>
<td class="currency">115  84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Petrol for mower July 07</td>
<td class="currency">11  89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Q &amp;C copies &amp; laminating pouches</td>
<td class="currency">4  54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick Thornley &mdash; set up of web site</td>
<td class="currency">1,541  25</td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Financial Situation</h3>
<p><em>(as at Fri. 14<sup>th</sup> March 2008)</em></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>General current</td>
<td class="currency">1,000  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Liquidity</td>
<td class="currency">55,626  78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fixed Term</td>
<td class="currency">32,851  03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent Current</td>
<td class="currency">7,833  77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Housing Maintenance</td>
<td class="currency">2,553  42</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The bank statements had been brought to the meeting and seen by Members of the Board.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Correspondence</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Manx Telecom &ndash; phone box at The Level.</h3>
<p>They were reviewing all the payphones on the Island as part of a major upgrade which would &lsquo;replace all existing units with new cash-only payphones that are fully compatible with the next generation of exchange network (NGN).&rsquo;</p>
<p>They proposed to take away the phone box at The Level as it had only taken &pound;30 in the previous year.  &lsquo;The cost of replacing the payphone would far outweigh any future revenues in a fast declining market.  An alternative public payphone exists are Colby Bridge and there is mobile coverage in the area.  With these factors in mind, it is their intention to remove this payphone following 60 days public notification in the kiosk.  This withdrawal is compliant with the guidelines agreed with the Communications Commissioners which I have enclosed for your information  I would appreciate you informing the Commissioners of our intentions of our intentions and feeding back any comments they may have&rsquo;.   Graham Shimmin, Product Manager.</p>
<p>Members did not object to the removal of the box, provided there was consultation with the people in the area.</p>
<p>It was agreed that Manx Telecom should be approached, once again, with regard to providing mobile phone cover in the Cregneash/Sound area.  It was to be suggested that they investigate putting a mobile mast on Cronk-e-Watch</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Application for License to Dispose of Waste</h3>
<p>08/01578/EPWDE  Moorhouse Farm Ltd, Moorhouse Farm, Mount Gawne Road had applied to DoLGE for a licence to dispose of waste at Moorhouse, a modification of existing licence.  </p>
<p>It transpired that this was not at Moorhouse but at Earystane., which is in Arbory.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>School Crossing, Ballafesson Road, Port Erin.</h3>
<p>Letter from Road Safety Manager &ndash; &lsquo;You may be aware that the school crossing patrol officer at the Ballafesson Road site has recently resigned from her post.  Since then it has not been possible to staff the crossing with a relief officer.  Patrol sites are usually established subject to the criteria set out in the school crossing patrol guidelines.  However, this patrol site was established in September 2005 as part of a developing safer route to school scheme with the intention that its usage would increase, this has not happened.  At a recent survey the number of pupils using the patrol site was very low.  The head teacher of Rushen Primary School mentioned the crossing in last month&rsquo;s newsletter and asked for comments, of which there were none.  The unit therefore is, with regret, looking into disestablishing this patrol site.  Before this happens I would welcome your comments.&rsquo;</p>
<p>There were no objections to this proposal.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Licensing and Registration of Vehicles (Amendment) Regulations &ndash; Draft.</h3>
<p>Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Road Closure Application &ndash;</h3>
<p><strong>End to End Walk</strong>  21<sup>st</sup> September.  Mr Tinkler was to query whether the roads were actually closed.</p>
<p><strong>Parish Walk</strong>  21<sup>st</sup> June   - views on timing would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Noted.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Applications</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>08/0332.  Upper Kirkhill, Ballakilpheric.  Mr &amp; Mrs Berry</h3>
<p>Erection and repositioning stable block away from house and in a field.</p>
<p>Members objected to this as it was a fairly large building proposed some distance away from the existing house and yard.  It should be situated close to the buildings.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>08/0316.  Bridge House, Surby.  Mr A Crowther</h3>
<p>Two storey extension to the rear of the existing property to accommodate new kitchen, bathroom and bedroom areas.</p>
<p>There were no objections but it was noted that there was an existing manhole situated where the proposed extension was to be built. </p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>08/0413.  Fuschia Cottage, Ballakilpheric Road.  J Reynolds</h3>
<p>Siting of oil tank to replace bulk gas tank, removed prior to building renovation and extension.</p>
<p>No objections</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Planning Approvals</strong>  9, <strong>Planning Refusals</strong> 10, <strong>Planning Appeals</strong> none</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Other Planning Matters</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>PA 06/1930.  The Level Garage Site</h3>
<p><strong>Erection of two detached dwellings and associated parking and landscaping.</strong> Copy of letter from Deputy Secretary to the Planning Committee to </p>
<p>W B Vannan, Planning and Architectural Consultant &ndash; dated 7<sup>th</sup> March and sent to Arbory Commissioners and forwarded to RPC:-  &lsquo;I refer to your letter dated 17<sup>th</sup> August 2007 regarding conditions 3,4,and 6 of the above application, the contents of which were considered by the Senior Planning Officer at a meeting held on 7<sup>th</sup> March 2008.  Under the authority delegated to her by the Department, the Senior Planner determined that the use of Redlands Cambrian or Marley Monarch imitation slate would satisfy the requirements of condition 6 of the approval.  In respect of condition 4, the provision of visibility splays in accordance with the drawings approved at appeal, would satisfy that condition, subject to the walling within the splay not exceeding one metre in height.  In respect of condition 3 or the approval, the Senior Planner determined that the provision of a gated access at the top of the bank on the southern boundary, as shown in drawing received on the 22nd February 2008, would satisfy that condition.&rsquo;</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Completion Certificates</h3>
<p>None.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Any Other Business</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Postal Addresses in Rushen</h3>
<p>Mr Potts, The Views, Lhingague.  He had contacted the Clerk with his concerns about his address which now seemed to be Ballakillowy.  Delevery men were getting lost and going into Ballakillowey Estate.  There are no signs saying Ballakillowey Road, Lhingague or Ballakilpheric Road.</p>
<p>The Clerk pointed out that the sign to Ballakillowey Estate only says &lsquo;Ballakillowey&rsquo;.  </p>
<p>It was agreed to look at this and possibly to change the estate sign to something more appropriate.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Community Sports Halls</h3>
<p>These had been discussed in Tynwald and Mr Gill had been on Manx Radio talking about them.  The Clerk had contacted him to ask for more information.  These were to be separate building from the schools and would not involve school buildings or staff. They were to be built in various parts of the Island and Rushen had been identified as the best place to build the first one.  This would be on part of the playing field and it was hoped that, with Tynwald approval of the funding procedures proposed, that it would be built within a year.</p>
<p>Members were pleased that this may be going ahead as it was a much needed facility.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Thousla Cross/wreck of Jeune St Charles</h3>
<p>The Clerk drew Members&rsquo; attention to 8<sup>th</sup> April 2008 being the 150th anniversary of the wreck of the Jeaune St Charles and the rescue of some of the crew by men from The Howe and Port St Mary.  As it was Rushen Commissioners who had the Cross erected at the Sound to commemorate this it was felt that it should be remembered.</p>
<p>It was agreed that an article should be put in the newspapers giving information and inviting anyone interested to come along.  The Clerk was to contact Mel Wright and to also suggest that it could be put on Terry Cringle&rsquo;s page and to ask for a photographer to come along.</p>
<p>The Ceremony would be short and informal, with no formal invitations being sent out.</p>
<p>The Clerk was to get a wreath to be laid at the Cross.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Date of Next Meeting</h3>
<p>Wednesday 16<sup>th</sup> April 2008.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>This part of the meeting closed at 9:10pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/07/17/minutes-wed-19th-march-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notice of Candidate Elected</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/05/08/notice-of-candidate-elected/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/05/08/notice-of-candidate-elected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, Gillian Kelly, Returning Officer for the above election hereby declare that
THOMAS DAVID RADCLIFFE has been elected to serve as a Commissioner for a period until 1st May 2012.
The total number of votes given for each candidate at the above election was as follows:


RADCLIFFE, Thomas David
173


SKELLY, Laurence David
115


WILLIAMS, Clare Louise
115


The total number of votes cast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, Gillian Kelly, Returning Officer for the above election hereby declare that</p>
<p><strong>THOMAS DAVID RADCLIFFE</strong> has been elected to serve as a Commissioner for a period until 1<sup>st</sup> May 2012.</p>
<p>The total number of votes given for each candidate at the above election was as follows:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>RADCLIFFE, Thomas David</th>
<td>173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>SKELLY, Laurence David</th>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>WILLIAMS, Clare Louise</th>
<td>115</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The total number of votes cast were 404 (32.8% poll)<br />
There was 1 ballot paper rejected for &lsquo;voting for more candidates than vacancies to be filled&rsquo;.</p>
<p>Dated this 8<sup>th</sup> day of May 2008.<br />
&mdash;Gillian Kelly, Returning Officer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/05/08/notice-of-candidate-elected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Details 8th May 2008</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/16/election-details-8th-may-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/16/election-details-8th-may-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Local Elections Act 1986
Parish of Rushen
Notice is hereby given that a poll for the election of one member of rushen parish commissioners will take place on Thursday 8th May 2008 and will commence at 8am and close at 8PM on that day.
The Candidates nominated for this Election are:




Name


Address


Description


Proposer


Seconder



Thomas David Radcliffe
Ballafesson Farmhouse, Ballafesson
Joiner
Stanley Ditchfield Clucas
Monica Geraldine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-57" title="Election, May 2008" src="http://rushen-commissioners.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/elecpostermay081.gif" alt="Poster for the May 2008 Election" width="500" height="771" /></p>
<p><span id="more-56"></span></p>
<h4>Local Elections Act 1986</p>
<p>Parish of Rushen</h4>
<p>Notice is hereby given that a poll for the election of one member of rushen parish commissioners will take place on <strong>Thursday 8th May 2008</strong> and will commence at 8am and close at 8PM on that day.</p>
<p>The Candidates nominated for this Election are:</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>
<h4>Name</h4>
</th>
<th>
<h4>Address</h4>
</th>
<th>
<h4>Description</h4>
</th>
<th>
<h4>Proposer</h4>
</th>
<th>
<h4>Seconder</h4>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Thomas David Radcliffe</strong></td>
<td>Ballafesson Farmhouse, Ballafesson</td>
<td>Joiner</td>
<td>Stanley Ditchfield Clucas</td>
<td>Monica Geraldine Radcliffe</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Laurence David Skelly</strong></td>
<td>Glenlea House, Truggan Rd.</td>
<td>Businessman</td>
<td>John Fullerton Maddrell</td>
<td>Derek Harold Cain</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Clare Louise Williams</strong></td>
<td>Newholme, Ballachurry Corner, Ballafesson</td>
<td>Housewife and part-time veterinarian assistant</td>
<td>Donald James Stewart</td>
<td>Joseph Glen Driver</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>The Polling Station for this Election is:</h4>
<p>Ballafesson Methodist Church Hall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/16/election-details-8th-may-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern Amenity Site Report 2007</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/11/southern-amenity-site-report-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/11/southern-amenity-site-report-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Butler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the year&#8217;s major events was the withdrawal of the green waste contract by the Government. They had the option to extend the contract for another two years but decided for a number of reasons not to do so.
Reasons for not extending the contract:

The Department needed to fund other projects
The other Sites paid for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the year&rsquo;s major events was the withdrawal of the green waste contract by the Government. They had the option to extend the contract for another two years but decided for a number of reasons not to do so.</p>
<h4>Reasons for not extending the contract:</h4>
<ul>
<li>The Department needed to fund other projects</li>
<li>The other Sites paid for the disposal of their green waste and the Department deemed it unfair the Southern had theirs paid for, it decided to pay for the rent of the Site as part of their policy in treating all Sites equally.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Board looked at a variety of options and determined it would be best to carry on with composting, offer screened material back to the public for a small donation ( to offset the costs of screening) with pre-screened material freely available in small or large quantities. The Douglas Corporation Composting machine shreds the material two days a fortnight.</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p>A new Digger replaced the old machine, with the trade in and money used from reserves it has been paid for out right. Although there have been a number of teething problems it has made life easier with less down time due to break downs. The responsibility for the machine and its essential maintenance has been given to one of the Operatives.</p>
<p>All Sites are now open to everybody from any area of the Island there has been no noticeable increase or decrease in traffic because of this and it has meant alternative options are available if this Site needs to shut due to adverse weather conditions.</p>
<p>The Site opened the whole of Easter in 2007 a successful initiative with it being very busy the whole of the 4 day period helped by the excellent weather.  The Public response was especially positive and with many complements received. On the down side on the Tuesday after the Site needed to close an hour after opening to sort out the backlog of accumulated rubbish.</p>
<p>Public opening hours are Monday-Thursday 10-4 Friday 10-3.30 Saturday and Sunday 10-4.30pm Monday &ndash;Friday the Site shuts between 12-1pm to allow for the loading of the rubbish and Sat and Sunday 12-12.30pm for lunch. Operational restrictions mean any work involving the digger on the main Site must be done in the absence of the public. Other Sites do not have quite the same problems as rubbish is placed directly into the skips.</p>
<p>The Government charges remain the same at &pound;100 a tonne for Commercial waste, &pound;10 a tonne for domestic and wood &pound;35 a tonne. Site Commercial charges have been increase by the Board from April 2008 to &pound;30 a tonne. The Board continues to charge Domestic customers a small amount for large loads of green waste, DIY, house clearances etc, in line with the Government policy of Polluter Pays.</p>
<p>During the year, the Energy from Waste made another stand about acceptable waste types. Metal is a big issue and although it can be removed at the plant it is better if it doesn&rsquo;t find its way there in the first place Zero Waste Mann and SITA placed an ad in Manx Tales requesting the Public to recycle metals, batteries and glass rather than put them into their dustbin. Metal, which has not gone through the EFWF, is of greater value in terms of recycling.</p>
<p>The rent payable to Port St Mary Commissioners is set to increase from April 2008 hopefully it will be an inflationary increase set by the Manx RPI.</p>
<p>Closure due to high winds occurred on several occasions. This is for the safety of the Public and staff, to avoid littering the countryside or causing an accident on the road from windblown debris. Generally, the west and northerly winds cause the most problems; unfortunately, if someone stands at the gate it can be appear to be relatively calm.</p>
<p>The majority of the times staff remain on Site and complete any maintenance work, if they are unable to work outside then they spring clean the mess quarters, sort out the shed, stock take, catch up with paper work etc. The decision to shut is not taken lightly, proper procedures are followed, the Met. Office contacted for an update and the Chairman kept fully informed, if appropriate, he authorizes the staff to go home early.</p>
<p>The Site shut 5 Full Days and 11 part days out of 344 days.</p>
<p>An improvement on last year, Staff have tried to anticipate adverse weather conditions and prepare the Site to minimise closure time, other Sites are not as exposed to the vagaries of the weather. </p>
<h3>Other News</h3>
<p>A small income is now generated from recycling car batteries.</p>
<p>The Site and Public participated with the National Sports Centre Manager in collecting sports equipment for Zambia which arrived there recently.</p>
<p>Police have assisted tracking down a couple of people whom have dropped off fridges and failed to pay for them.</p>
<p>The first fixed and portable line testing, carried out at the request of the Insurance Company,</p>
<p>resulted in a couple of minor repairs. </p>
<p>A member of staff was nominated for a Manx Radio community award for his services at the Site and won a bottle of champagne</p>
<p>We were able to connect a local charity setting up a home for a young person with someone emptying a house both parties were happy to assist each other.</p>
<p>The Board agreed to a Broadband connection at the Site, it is limited to 4 GB per month, but that is more than enough for its present needs and the office computer replaced as keys were peeling off and the CD drive not working properly.</p>
<p>The Red Cross withdrew the recycling of printer cartridges as it wasn&rsquo;t cost effective, Crossroads Carers took its place but have realised it is taking up too much administration time.</p>
<p>Big Fish are going to take laser printer cartridges and any HP ones for recycling. Share the Care spectacles and old mobile phones.</p>
<p>Weighbridge yearly check by the Governments weights and measures Dept ok</p>
<p>SITA now has the contract for the removal of hazardous household waste and the General Public can contact them directly i.e. Andrew Walker - 01628 513247 or email andrew[dot]walker(at)sita.co.uk</p>
<p>Mr Butt reintroduced regular joint CA staff meetings at which it was agreed to make all the Sites No Smoking Areas as of January 1 prompted by an incident in the North.</p>
<p>Phone books were not collected separately this year so went to the EFWF</p>
<h3>Training completed in 2007</h3>
<p>First Aid, Fire Warden, Manual Handling, Working Safely</p>
<h3>Recycling/waste Figures Jan 07-Dec 07</h3>
<h4>these figures give a guideline only.</h4>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Engine Oil</th>
<td>2 pick ups</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Metal</th>
<td>229.24 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rubble</th>
<td>343 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Inert (Glass and soil)</th>
<td>205 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Clothes</th>
<td>9  tonnes Manx Waste Solutions (Estimate)<br />? tonnes Salvation Army</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Green Waste</th>
<td>No figures</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Glass</th>
<td>109 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Paper</th>
<td>144 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Aluminium Cans</th>
<td>3 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Fridges</th>
<td>10 tonnes (approx)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Car Batteries</th>
<td>fsd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Household Batteries</th>
<td>2 pick-ups</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Household Items put into Covered Bay</th>
<td>Unknown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Energy from Waste Facility</th>
<td>2039.9 tonnes Jan-Nov</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<h4>Of which:</h4>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Commercial waste to EFWF</th>
<td>139.7 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Wood</th>
<td>48.61 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Domestic</th>
<td>1851.59 tonnes</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Landfill</th>
<td>2.5 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Fluorescent tubes</th>
<td>598</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Bulbs</th>
<td>137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>TV&rsquo;s</th>
<td>1034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Monitors</th>
<td>598</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Waste from Commissioners</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Port Erin</th>
<td>22.24 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Castletown</th>
<td>48.02 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Port St Mary</th>
<td>65.15 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Arbory</th>
<td>2.39 tonnes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Malew</th>
<td>41.3 tonnes<br />green kerbside pilot scheme</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Malew</th>
<td>1.54 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rushen</th>
<td>630kg occasional beach clean or fly tipped rubbish</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Malew&rsquo;s tonnages are mostly from the grass kerbside collection scheme they initiated. (Figures April-December) The weights have fluctuated from 2.22tonnes&ndash;10kg</p>
<p>Just to remind  everyone the reason the Board agreed the Covered Bay should shut on a Sunday afternoon was because it was being used as a meeting place for many individuals, from all areas of the Island &ndash;trying to restrict the amount of time any one person spent in this area did not work. The positive aspect of this are the two part time members of staff can complete basic tidying tasks and more importantly the public wishing to dispose of their rubbish can do so without fighting for a car space. Soil conditioner is available for bagging and collection on a Sunday afternoon. the Recycling Bay shuts are when the high winds are borderline in terms of closing and full attention needs to be given to the safety of those dropping off or if there is maintenance on Site and it is a matter of getting the cars in and out.</p>
<p>Mr Bennett is Chairman, Mr W Hansen (PSM) Vice Chair All Board Members were re-elected.</p>
<p><strong>Amanda Butler</strong><br />
<em>Clerk of the Southern Amenity Site</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/11/southern-amenity-site-report-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Election on Thursday 8th May</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/03/new-election-thursday-8th-may/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/03/new-election-thursday-8th-may/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As there were only 4 candidates for the five seats we have to hold a further election for the remaining member.
The new Election will be on Thursday 8th May.
Nominations close on Thursday 10th April &#8212; to be received no later than 5pm by the Clerk.
Nomination forms can be obtained from the Clerk at the office [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As there were only 4 candidates for the five seats we have to hold a further election for the remaining member.</p>
<p>The new Election will be on <strong>Thursday 8<sup>th</sup> May</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Nominations close on Thursday 10<sup>th</sup> April</strong> &mdash; to be received no later than 5pm by the Clerk.</p>
<p>Nomination forms can be obtained from the Clerk at the office – <a href="/contact/#gilliankelly">phone 834501</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/04/03/new-election-thursday-8th-may/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>150th Anniversary Commemoration</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/03/29/150th-anniversary-commemoration/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/03/29/150th-anniversary-commemoration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[thousla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wreck of the Jeune St Charles and the Bravery of Men from the Howe and Port St Mary.
On 8th April Rushen Parish Commissioners will be commemorating the 150th anniversary of an act of heroism by men from The Howe and Port St Mary who, at great risk to themselves, rescued some the crew of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The Wreck of the Jeune St Charles and the Bravery of Men from the Howe and Port St Mary.</h3>
<p>On 8<sup>th</sup> April Rushen Parish Commissioners will be commemorating the 150<sup>th</sup> anniversary of an act of heroism by men from The Howe and Port St Mary who, at great risk to themselves, rescued some the crew of the Jeune St Charles from certain death in the treacherous waters of The Sound.  The rescue took place on the morning of 8<sup>th</sup> April 1858 in dreadful conditions</p>
<p>The Thousla Cross, in the form of a cross of Lorraine, is the memorial to mark this event and which Rushen Commissioners had erected at The Sound, overlooking the Thousla rock, after which it is named, so that the event would never be forgotten.</p>
<p><span id="more-39"></span> </p>
<p>The following is part of the record of events and is taken from the booklet written by Stanley Clucas, CP, who is a former Commissioner.</p>
<p>On 29<sup>th</sup> May 1858 the French schooner Jeune St Charles set sail from Pontrieux, Northern France to Londonderry, Northern Ireland with a cargo of flour.  The cargo was very valuable as they was a great shortage of wheat in the aftermath of the Crimean War.  There was a crew of six, the Captain was Joseph Jegou from Lezardrieux and he had his 13 year old brother, Yves making his first voyage as ships boy.  There was also another ships boy, 14 year old Francois Ave.</p>
<p>With favourable winds the journey should have taken about five days.  However, on 4<sup>th</sup> April they were caught up in a south easterly gale and were forced to heave-to.  There were heavy seas and damage caused to the ship but they set sail again at 4am in a full south easterly and blinding rain.  By 10pm they were under sail when the weather cleared briefly.  They saw the lights of the Calf of Man to the west ward.  The Captain judged his position to be too close to the Isle and he decide to drop anchor and weather the storm.  The mate gave the alarm that there was land at a distance of only one cable so they immediately dropped the two bow anchors to hold them.  The sea was washing over from stem to stern and the pumps manned to keep them afloat. </p>
<p>At 8am on the eighth day the anchor chains parted and the ship began to drift along the coast, being driven along about three fathoms from the cliffs her head could not be got out of the sea so they dropped their one remaining anchor in the channel which separates the Isle of Man form the Calf of Man.  It held just long enough for them to launch a long boat and immediately after that the anchor hawser broke. It was obvious to the crew that the ship was going to be swept through the channel and break up on the rocks so, taking a few personal possessions and the ships papers they abandoned the Jeune St Charles to he fate.  </p>
<p>The wind and the currents were so strong that before they had time to ship the oars both the Jeune St Charles and the long boat went aground on a rock awash in kid channel. The first wave took away their oars, the second capsized the long boat and all six crew were left clinging perilously to the rocks. One minute later the two ships boys, Yves and Francois, could no longer hold on and disappeared into the waves and perished.  The Captain, mate and two crew were left clinging to the rocks in terrible anguish, the waves breaking over them tearing the clothes and flesh from their bodies.</p>
<p>At first light the dangerous position of the French schooner had been noticed by farmers on the hillside overlooking the eastern approaches to the Sound.  Word quickly spread to Port St Mary and there had been great concern for the safety of the ship.  For three days the persistent south easterly storm force winds had swept across the mouth of the harbour making it impossible to attempt a rescue.  When news of the ship wreck and the crew’s plight was known it was determined that a rescue attempt would have to be made.  </p>
<p>The only possible way would be to launch a substantial rowing boat from the Sound and this was carried from Port St Mary to the Sound by relays of men via The Howe and Cregneash.  The boat, crewed by Henry Qualtrough, Thomas Taubman, John Maddrell, Edward Fargher and Thomas Keig was launched from the Sound  but could not reach the wreck and, after battling against the south east wind and the flood tide, the rescuers were swept past the desperate sailors and, to save their own lives, landed on the Calf.  A second boat was carried from Port St Mary and this was crewed by Thomas Harrison, Joseph Harrison, John Watterson, Daniel Lace and John Karran.  These men, by a combination of skilled seamanship and a total disregard for their own safety launched their frail craft into the ragin channel in a final attempt at rescue.  The cries of the beleagured French men could be heard clearly by those on shore as each wave broke over their heads.  Their ordeal had lasted for three hours and hope had almost gone when the first boat had been swept past.  Straining on the oars the second boat was swept towards them and they were grasped by willing hands and taken aboard, to be driven by the strong current to the safety of the Calf.</p>
<p>The Frenchmen were badly injured but were looked after by the lighthouse keepers.  They were later taken to Castletown in the care of Dr Underwood and, when somewhat recovered were taken into the care of the French consul in Liverpool.</p>
<p>An eye witness of the rescue said “I was never prouder of my countrymen than on this occasion.  I have witnessed many wrecks and assisted at saving lives but never saw a crew more determined to risk all to save human lives, especially taking into account the frail and tiny boat, the bad oars, the raging sea, the fearful tide rushing through the narrow channel, the rocks only appearing at intervals threatening the destruction to their feeble boat at the fall of every breaking surge.  I sincerely hope that their bravery may be a stimulus to others”.</p>
<p>Their bravery was indeed recognised and, on the 7<sup>th</sup> December 1858,  the crew of the second boat were presented with silver medals by the Lieutenant Governor on behalf of the French Government.</p>
<p>After the wreck there was great agitation for a beacon to be erected on the “Thousla Rock” for the safety of shipping and the Manx fishing fleet.  The Commissioners of the Northern Lighthouses erected a beacon on the rock the construction also provided a refuge where shipwrecked mariners could remain out of reach of wind and sea.  This was completed in 1859.  The Cross of Lorraine was erected using money raised in France and this was put on top of the beacon in memory of the two ship’s boys who had been lost.  That cross was lost during a storm in 1905 but the beacon was replaced and a wooden cross constructed of red wood by Mr Willie Collister, was erected.</p>
<p>In 1980 the Commissioners of the Northern Lighthouses had the cross removed so that it could be replaced by a gas light to give better warning to shipping.  The cross was left in the builders yard until it was rescued by Rushen Parish Commissioners, in whose area the Sound and Calf lie and they decided to erect it at the Sound as a memorial to the bravery of local men.  In the summer of 1981 a service of dedication was held.</p>
<p>Rushen Parish Commissioners ensure that this memorial is kept painted and the ground around it in good order so that those looking at it can look across the Sound to the treacherous rocks and try to imagine the bravery of two crews of the rowing boats who were prepared to risk their own lives to rescue fellow sailors.  There is always a small bunch of flowers placed by the cross but it is not known by who.  The Commissioners have named their Charitable Trust <a title="More about the Thousla Cross Trust" href="http://rushen-commissioners.com/the-thousla-cross-trust/">The Thousla Cross Trust</a> to honour those men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/03/29/150th-anniversary-commemoration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minutes, Wed 27th Feb. 2008</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/02/27/minutes-wed-27th-feb-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/02/27/minutes-wed-27th-feb-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Minutes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please note &#8211; these Minutes are shortened for the Web Site.  The full version can be read at the Office.
The Minutes of the Meeting held Wed. 16th January 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read and agreed a true record.

Matters Arising:




Rates Estimates
The Clerk had informed the Chief Executive of DoLGE that Rushen&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="highlight">Please note &ndash; these Minutes are shortened for the Web Site.  The full version can be read at the Office.</p>
<p>The Minutes of the Meeting held Wed. 16<sup>th</sup> January 2008, having previously been circulated, were taken as read and agreed a true record.</p>
<p><span id="more-42"></span></p>
<h3>Matters Arising:</h3>
<ol>
<li>
<ol>
<li>
<h3>Rates Estimates</h3>
<p>The Clerk had informed the Chief Executive of DoLGE that Rushen&rsquo;s Rate remained at 67p plus &pound;5 Per Household charge.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3> Local Authority Election</h3>
<p> Thursday 24<sup>th</sup> April 2008.  Polling Station open 8am to 8pm. The Clerk, as Returning Officer, had booked Ballafesson Hall as the Polling Station for East and West Rushen, there being no request from the Board to have more than one Polling Station.</p>
<p> Nominations were to close 5pm Thursday 27<sup>th</sup> March.  Withdrawal/objections by 2pm 31<sup>st</sup> March.</p>
<p>DoLGE were to publish a Notice of Election in Courier Thursday 13<sup>th</sup> March and in Examiner on Monday 17<sup>th</sup> March which would cover all the Local Authority elections.  Local Authorities to put notices up around their areas.</p>
<p>Leaflets had been received from DoLGE giving information for those interested in standing for election.</p>
<p><strong>Poll Cards &mdash; Economic Affairs</strong> could provide the cards but they needed to order the special paper well in advance.  The cost of the paper for Rushen was &pound;40.36 (1,223 cards). The Clerk had confirmed that they go ahead and order the paper for Rushen.</p>
<p>DoLGE has informed Local Authorities that they should open an account with the Post Office with regard to sending out the Polling Cards for the election.  The Post Office had been in touch with the Clerk and, during the discussion, it transpired that Local Authorities would have to provide two trade references and a bank reference to debit their account which would cost &pound;8 50.  Their &lsquo;auditing protocol cannot accept the application without the references&rsquo;.  It was felt by the Board entirely inappropriate that a Local Authority should have to provide such references and therefore an account would not be opened.  The alternative of providing a cheque to cover the amount, should there be an election, was to be taken and a letter was to be sent to the Post Office giving Members views.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Audit &amp; Accounts</h3>
<p> Invoice received from Moore Stephens &mdash; &pound;235.00 including vat.  This was felt to be very good value and due, in part, to Mr Ronan completing the accounts to the level now required for audit.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Waste Management</h3>
<p><strong>Bins</strong> &mdash;  The Clerk had been in touch with Schaeffers.  She had informed Schaeffers that other Local Authorities were in need of some bins and that Ian Jones of Jones Services was dealing with them.   She had left it with Ian Jones to contact Peel Commissioners and the others and see what could be done.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Area Plan</h3>
<p>Ian McCauley and Emily Curphey had confirmed that they could attend a meeting to discuss this on Monday 3rd March at 7 30pm at Ballafesson Hall.</p>
<p>A discussion took place as to what Members would like to be dealt with and the Clerk was to set this out and send it the Emily Curphey so that there would be a basis for discussion.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>National Heritage Area</h3>
<p>The Clerk reported that there were still concerns from residents about this going ahead.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>MNH</h3>
<p>Nothing at present.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Street Lighting at Cregneash</h3>
<p>The new lanterns had not arrived yet.  The column would be painted at the same time as the new lanterns were installed.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>MEA &mdash; Street Lighting</h3>
<p>The Clerk had given instructions, after consultation with the Chairman and Vice-chairman,  for the new light to be put down Mount Gawne Road &ndash; by the railway line.  150 watt bulb, long arm.</p>
<p>Garth Avenue &ndash; new fitting required on light.  Cost - &pound;343  plus vat.  The Clerk had asked the MEA go ahead as she had been contacted by a lady from there asking about it as she found it very dark without the light.</p>
<p> Mr Cain asked the Clerk to check up on how often the columns were painted as he had seen some which gave the appearance of not having been painted for a considerable time.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Civic Amenity Site</h3>
<p>Site Report for 2007 received plus Estimates &mdash; copied given to Members.  Noted. </p>
</li>
<li>
<h3> Traffic Matters</h3>
<p> Next Meeting was on 20<sup>th</sup> Feb.  Items for Agenda - no pavement on Plantation Road/Hill.</p>
<p>Mr Vernon had attended and gave a report.  There would be no more speed limits made until a major review had been carried out.  With regard to Plantation Hill &ndash; &lsquo;there had never been any accidents&rsquo; and there was no money for what would be a major undertaking.   With regard to the proposed Cycle Track along the pavement on Shore Road and through to Scarlett, the DoT had said that this &lsquo;would not be possible&rsquo; and it would be left on &lsquo;hold&rsquo;.</p>
<p>Problems with traffic in the south had been discussed along with the possibility of a bypass road in Ballasalla.  It was felt that Local Authorities should have a combined discussion on this.</p>
<p>The next meeting would be on14<sup>th</sup> May.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Police</h3>
<p> The Clerk reported an incident which had occurred at tea-time on 18<sup>th</sup> Jan. She had heard lots of shooting in the direction of Moorhouse/Croit-e-Caley.  This went on for 20-30 minutes with people shouting.  As she knew it is illegal to shoot in the hours of darkness she was concerned that there may be something serious going on.  When she heard someone shouting &ldquo;he&rsquo;s over there&rdquo; she rang the Police in Port Erin to report it.  She spoke to Special Constable Faragher who said that there was nobody at the Station and they were &lsquo;bombed out&rsquo; but that he would try to get somebody and would ring later.  He never rang her so she brought it up at the Police Meeting on 24th.  The Clerk said she had been concerned as incidents with guns are very serious and there are houses on Mount Gawne Road and Croit-e-Caley, there is a footpath running through the land and also the railway line which people walk their dogs along in the winter.  Sgt. Ged Power said he would look into it and get back to her.</p>
<p>He rang the next day to say that they had been very busy with arrests but that Special Const. Faragher had spoken to them, giving them a formal warning.</p>
<p>There was a Police Meeting on 24<sup>th</sup>.  Mr Vernon and the Clerk had attended.  Crime figures were given.</p>
<p><strong>Letter from Inspector Paul Cubbon</strong> &ndash; he would like to know what major issues most affect the quality of life in your area in order that they could again prioritise both Police and partner agency focus for the year ahead.  Dependent on feedback he hoped to have in place a set &lsquo;Southern Partnership Plan&rsquo; by March 2008.  Members did not feel that there were any issues at the moment.</p>
<p><strong>Operation Baboon &ndash; &lsquo;an initiative to improve the quality of life in your neighbourhood&rsquo;</strong>. The Police were getting involved in dealing with problem vehicles &ndash; abandoned, untaxed, etc.  Their target was to deal with 100 vehicles in the south during the month of February.  &ndash; targets were &ndash; no road tax; no insurance; abandoned; dangerous condition; congestion; illegal or inconsiderate parking.  Should there be any problem vehicles in Rushen then the Clerk would report them to the Police.<br />Next Meeting 28<sup>th</sup> Feb.</p>
<p><strong>Inspector Paul Cubbon &ndash; promotion</strong>.  He had been promoted to Superintendent from 28<sup>th</sup> Feb and would be leaving the Southern Neighbourhood Policing Team and be based at Headquarters.  His successor would be <strong>Inspector Michael Musson</strong> from 25<sup>th</sup> Feb.</p>
<p> A letter of congratulations to be sent to Inspector Cubbon.</p>
<p>Sergeant Ged Power would be leaving the neighbourhood on 24<sup>th</sup> February to take over the running of the Constabulary&rsquo;s Alcohol Unit.  His place would be taken by one of the Douglas patrol sergeants, Phil Drowley.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Litter, dog fouling, fly tipping, beach cleaning</h3>
<p>Mr Ronan reported that CRHS were keen to have another beach clean before the summer.  Mr Ronan would liaise with them and it was thought that May would be suitable as most of the storms should then be passed.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Ballafesson Playing Field</h3>
<p><strong>Lease</strong> &ndash; the Clerk had brought two copies to the meeting and the Chairman and Clerk signed them so that Mr Gunn could take them to Messrs Radcliffe for their signatures.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Croit-e-Caley, The Level, Carrick Bay View</h3>
<p><strong>Hartford Homes</strong> &ndash; the Appeal by the neighbours failed so work had re-started.</p>
<p><strong>Level Garage Site</strong> &ndash; work had started with the footings being made.  The houses looked very close to the road but, they were shown as such on the plans.</p>
<p><strong>Mona Rechabite Hall</strong> -  this had now been sold and planning application received.  They were proposing to build a garage in the position where the water flooded out of the field, through the site, over the pavement and onto the road. It was presumed that the water problem would be tackled when carrying out the work.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Car Park, The Howe</h3>
<p>There had been nothing from the Water Authority with regard to the last letter.  The Clerk to get in touch with them again.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3> Web Site</h3>
<p>Mr Ronan would get in touch with Mr Thornley as there seemed to be some delay in getting it up and running.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Department of Transport</h3>
<p>Flooding at Ballafesson, water on road at Ballachrink and the Howe. The Clerk had written to Dept of Transport on 20<sup>th</sup> Jan. and it has been acknowledged and passed on to Andy Potter.</p>
<p><strong>Pavement at Plantation Hill</strong> &ndash; The Clerk had written to Port St Mary Commissioners giving them Rushen&rsquo;s  concerns and stating that a letter had been sent to DoT.</p>
<p>Reply from PSM &ndash; &lsquo;It is acknowledged that the Howe Road at its junction with Plantation Road and Truggan Road is a bottleneck for traffic.  My Commissioners will be requesting further information be collected by DoT Highways regarding traffic speed and RTA statistics as to whether road widening or pavement provision should be sought.</p>
<p>Also &ndash; a copy of PSM&rsquo;s letter to Andy Potter, DoT &ndash; &lsquo;I believe you have been in recent communication with the Clerk of Rushen Parish Commissioners regarding possible provisions of pavements on Plantation Road, Port St Mary.  My Commissioners have requested copies of correspondence on the matter between your Department and Rushen Commissioners if possible ahead of the Southern Traffic Management Liaison Group later this month.  For your information one of my Commissioners, Mr Cooil of Ballacreggan Farm, was aware that DoT did actively look at the widening of part of the junction of Plantation Road and Truggan Road and that he had been party to primary discussions as he was a land owner who would be affected.&rsquo;</p>
<p>This had been discussed at the Traffic Meeting and reported at that part of the meeting.</p>
<p><strong>Flooding at Ballafesson</strong> -  The Clerk had been called out again at 8 30am on 21<sup>st</sup> Jan.    Mr Turvey&rsquo;s garden and next door (Gawne&rsquo;s Bungalows) were flooded again and water was pouring down the road. He had called the Fire Service who were there when she went over.   Ken Skinner came past and said that most of the water was coming from behind his house.  She went with him to look at it.  Behind Two Ways is a small field and the banks of the ditch were broken away and the water was coming down over the field instead of across the top and into the ditch in the field alongside.</p>
<p>She had gone back to the office to see if she could find out who owned the land. She wrote to him that day asking him to repair the ditch and pointing out that he was leaving himself open to litigation if he did nothing.  She had not heard from him but had since been back to check to see if the work has been done and she reported that the bank had been built up.</p>
<p><strong>Glen Chass</strong> -  (road widening at corner by Gorse Lea).</p>
<p>The Clerk had written to DoT and Jim Davidson had sent a plan of the amount of land which would need to be bought to widen and make a passing place.</p>
<p><strong>Ballafesson Road &ndash; Ballachurry</strong>.  Mr Cain had spoken with Mr Clucas with regard to the problems which could arise when the new entrance is made from the new development onto Ballafesson Road.</p>
<p>Mr Vernon had mentioned this at the Traffic meeting, with regard to having double yellow lines on the road, especially near the corner.  Hazel Fletcher had been unaware of the planning application but would look into it.</p>
<p>Surby Road &ndash; flooding.  There had been a lot of water coming down Surby Road and some of it was from a field.  A letter to be sent to the owners asking if they could have the ditches cleared to stop the problem.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Hedges &amp; Verges</h3>
<p>The Clerk had circulated the Parishes by email to see what they were doing about taking responsibility for dealing with the High Hedges Legislation..  Those who answered were doing it, with the exception of Arbory.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Municipal Association</h3>
<p><strong>Seminar on Recycling</strong>.  Mr Gunn, Mr Vernon and the Clerk attended.  There were various views from the people speaking at it.  <strong>George Uhlenbroek</strong>  (Friends of the Earth) said that kerbside collection is very expensive &ndash; bring sites where people don&rsquo;t make a special journey are better &ndash; need to reduce the waste;<br />
    <strong>Muriel Garland</strong> (Zero Waste Mann) said that everything should be recycled &ndash; no waste;<br />
    <strong>Dudley Butt</strong> &ndash; recycling costs for paper are negligible &ndash; use empty wagons going back; they would be collecting plastic from September; glass is made into &lsquo;eco sand&rsquo;;  WEE (electricals) in UK there is an amount put onto the cost of electrical goods which is used to recycle them.  Although we have to pay that there is no way of getting it back from the manufacturers so we can use it towards recycling &ndash; they had met with DEFRA to lobby them but there is no mechanism for this.  They could try people here not having to pay it but it would only work if it was shown on the invoice as an actual cost and it often isn&rsquo;t.</p>
<p><strong>Mr Birchenough</strong> from Ballaneddin Compost also spoke.  They make 4,000 tonnes of compost every year.  Windrows are the most economic way of doing this. It goes through several screenings and is an excellent product.  Ramsey Commissioners have been using it at Mooragh Park &ndash; when they used peat based bought from UK 11 pallets cost &pound;2,000 &ndash; the Ballaneddin compost cost &pound;400.  If they mixed sewage pellets with it it would not make the BS Standard.  They have a stockpile of compost and there is a problem with people&rsquo;s perception &ndash; they need to see it as a valuable produce not as rubbish.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Donelly</strong> from Douglas Corporation spoke about their recycling trial at Governor&rsquo;s Hill.  This was a success and they learned useful lessons.</p>
<p>Also mentioned that they send their shredder down to the SCAS 2 days a week.  We should work together by agreement and share resources.  They had a chewing gum removal machine which is under-used &ndash; could be used by others.</p>
<p>The Minister spoke :&ndash;   within 2/3 years there would be a restructure of waste charges &lsquo;and it will be murder&rsquo;.  The 90% subsidy is unsustainable.  The Rating system is unsupportable.<br />
    If we do not do the recycling DoLGE will &ndash; and they will charge us.</p>
<p><strong>Housing</strong> &ndash; Onchan Commissioners had written to the Association with a submission from their Housing Committee and approved by the Board.  This was with regard to having fixed term tenancies for 5 years and reviewed after that date. This type of proposal had been mentioned by Local Authority representatives at all the Housing Seminars held for the past few years.  It was mentioned on Manx Radio by the Chairman of the Association.  Someone from DoLGE Housing came on to speak against it saying that having higher earners in an estate kept it from becoming run down (they did not mention that every house is subsidised by the tax-payer by &pound;100 per week &ndash; which was frequently mentioned at Housing Meetings.</p>
<p>Members felt that tenants should be asked to pay a more realistic rent, comparable to those in the private sector but they did not agree with fixed term tenancies.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Swimming Pool</h3>
<p>Invoice received:-  Total &ndash; &pound;3,782  97</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Costs comprise   &ndash; 2.5p rate on  RV of 117,168</td>
<td class="currency">2,929  20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>proportional loan charge based on estimated charge of &pound;12,00</td>
<td class="currency">1,098  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>loan charge adjustments for year end March 04/05/06 as per Castletown Comm.</td>
<td class="currency">244  23</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>M Ronan reported that the Board had met with the design team and the handover was scheduled for May.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Southern Health Committee</h3>
<p>As Mr Tinkler was not at the meeting there was no report.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Rushen Ambulance Committee</h3>
<p>Mr Vernon reported that there had been a letter from Mr Benson of the Committee.  The First Response Team now consisted of 4 plus 2 volunteers.  They would be requiring defibrillators.  The team would shortly be up and running.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Marashen Crescent Housing</h3>
<p>Mr Vernon said that there was nothing to report.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Digital Camera</h3>
<p>Mr Ronan had purchased a camera from Morrison Photos.  He had been able to get it for &pound;110 reduced from &pound;170.  The invoice was received for payment.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Secret Gardens in Rushen</h3>
<p>Mr Cain had been to see Mrs Maddrell again.  She had it in hand and would contact the Board if she needed assistance.  It was to be left to her to organise it.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Ballakilley Land.</h3>
<p>Letter from Peter Karran on behalf of the southern branch of The Liberal Vannin Party enquiring of any progress has been made with the Trustees of the land.  &lsquo;Have the Commissioners made any decisions to make sure that this land does not end up being developed for houses which ordinary people won&rsquo;t be able to afford, and also losing the opportunity of a much needed recreational area for the south of the Island and which would be a &lsquo;green lung&rsquo; for the area as well.&rsquo; He would be happy to meet to discuss it if it would help but in the meantime would like an update on the matter so that he can report back to the next meeting of the Liberal Vannin Party.</p>
<p>A reply had been sent giving the situation up to date.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Housing Consultative Conference</h3>
<p>This would be held on 6<sup>th</sup> March at Mount Murray.   The itinerary had been received.  The morning would be taken up with General Housing and the afternoon mainly with housing for older people, particularly sheltered housing.  One of the items for the morning would be Tenancy Enforcement, the speakers for that to be Sarah Burton and Nichola Pitts from Laurence Kennan, Advocates.  In the afternoon one of the items would be Innovation in Sheltered Housing &lsquo;speaker to be arranged&rsquo; also Energy Design for Sheltered Housing.</p>
<p>Mr Vernon would be attending.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Housing &ndash; Deficiency.</h3>
<p>Letter from Housing regarding the amount for Administration which Local Authorities are allowed to keep back when paying the Deficiency Payment to DoLGE.  This had been 5% for a number of years.  There were proposals to increase it providing those LAs agreed to certain conditions and complied with DoLGE&rsquo;s requirements as regards common standards and sharing best practise.  They had agreed that Rushen were doing that and could now claim 7.5% admin. for the deficiency payment calculations for 2007/08 and subsequent years.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Contract of Employment</h3>
<p>The Clerk had given Members a copy of her present Contract and the Job Description (out of date)   This was to be dealt with at the next meeting.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Public Sector Rent Increases 2008/09.</h3>
<p>DoLGE has sent confirmation that the public sector  rents would increase by 5%.  Points value would therefore increase from 87.37 to 91.74.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Revenue</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Rents</td>
<td class="currency">1,118  23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Searches</td>
<td class="currency">160  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rates</td>
<td class="currency">1,080  00</td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Accounts for Payment</h3>
<h4>(including VAT where appropriate)</h4>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Jones Services</td>
<td class="currency">2,171  71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clerk&rsquo;s Salary</td>
<td class="currency">750  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IOM Newspapers ad. For refuse tender</td>
<td class="currency">224  66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manx Telecom &ndash; phone January &amp; Feb</td>
<td class="currency">97  70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Southern Swim Pool year end March 08</td>
<td class="currency">3,782  97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MEA &ndash; new column &amp; light Sloc</td>
<td class="currency">1,617  55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent for Playing Field 07/08</td>
<td class="currency">200  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent for Hall &ndash; 1 year</td>
<td class="currency">500  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>H Kelly, grass cutting, bins, fly tipping Nov &ndash; Feb</td>
<td class="currency">95  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DoLGE &ndash; refuse disposal charge &ndash; Jan.</td>
<td class="currency">1,388  50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moore Stephens Audit &ndash; 06/07.</td>
<td class="currency">235  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Q &amp; C copies and paper</td>
<td class="currency">45  83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>K Skinner &ndash; check electrics 4 houses</td>
<td class="currency">126  11<br /><em>(housing)</em></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>(cheque for &pound;25 sent to Murray &lsquo;Santa&rsquo; Cringle)</p>
<p>The above accounts were approved for paying.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Financial Situation</h3>
<h4>(as at morning of 27<sup>th</sup> Feb. 2008)</h4>
<table>
<tr>
<td>General current  (rates)</td>
<td class="currency">250  00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Liquidity Manager (rates)</td>
<td class="currency">63,366  18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fixed Term   (rates)</td>
<td class="currency">32,851  03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rent current</td>
<td class="currency">6,749  05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Housing Maintenance</td>
<td class="currency">2,553  42</td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Correspondence</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<h3>Douglas Henry Bloom Noble Library.</h3>
<p>Letter from Douglas Corporation.  To coincide with the launch of the 2008 National Year of Reading as of 1<sup>st</sup> April they are embarking on a trial scheme whereby and local authority can enter into an agreement with the Council enabling residents from outside Douglas boundary to have free access to the library.  At present they would pay (from 1<sup>st</sup> April) &pound;23 for adults, &pound;11.50 for OAPs and &pound;2 for children.   They are suggesting instead a charge of a &pound;500 charge for LAs with a population over 1,500 and &pound;250 for those under 1,500.</p>
<p>This was noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>1<sup>st</sup> Supplemental List 2008</h3>
<p>Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Scalding Risks from Domestic Hot Water Systems.</h3>
<p>Letter from DoLGE.      As it was not relevant to Rushen&rsquo;s houses it was noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Manx Classic 18<sup>th</sup> April &ndash; The Sloc</h3>
<p>Letter from Manx Motor Racing Club Ltd.  Sloc Road will be closed from 09.15 hours until 16.30 hours or until finished, whichever is earlier.                  Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>IOM Local Government Pension Scheme.</h3>
<p>Letter from Port Erin Commissioners. &ndash; copy of letter they sent to the Treasurer of the scheme. Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Road Transport Licensing Committee.</h3>
<p>Applications, decisions and notices.  Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Chronically Sick &amp; Disabled Persons Committee</h3>
<p>Newsletter received.    Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>DASH -  Drug Advice Service &amp; Helpline</h3>
<p>Poster received &ndash; They were to hold  three cannabis awareness courses, the first of which was to be held on 9<sup>th</sup> March.                         Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Isle of Man Bank</h3>
<p>Their Terms and Conditions would in future be online at <a href="http://www.iombank.com/terms">www.iombank.com/terms</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Smokefree Mann</h3>
<p>Notes on their meeting held 29 Jan.  Noted.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Highways monthly</h3>
<p>Copy received.    Noted.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Applications</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0027.  New Haven, Shore Road.  New Haven Properties Ltd.</strong>  Construct two balconies to the rear of the new apartments under construction (pa 05/92429 &ndash; approved block of 4 apartments)<br />
    No objections.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0065.  Mona Rechabite Hall, The Level.  Mr &amp; Mrs N Goldsmith</strong>.  Alterations to provide increased accommodation, introduction of dormers and rooflights to roof at front and rear, replacement of windows and doors, addition of new lean-to utility room, remove existing garage and replace with new double garage in rear corner of site.<br />
    No objections.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0075.  Heaven&rsquo;s Gate, Ballakilpheric.  Mr &amp; Mrs P Metcalfe.  (re-submission)</strong>  Demolition of single garage and flat roof utility area and erection of new garage block together with remodelling of existing building.   (They were putting up the garage where they had applied to put the swimming pool previously).<br />
                    No objections.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0108.  Upper Kirkill, Ballakillowey.  Mr &amp; Mrs Berry</strong>. Resubmission therefore no fee.  Demolish existing dwelling and replacement with new.  (they had a previous PA &ndash; 07/1109 for extensions).</p>
<p>Members felt that, as this would be a prominent building on the hillside, it should be stone faced to reflect the rural area in which it was situated.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0098.  Saddlestones, Mount Gawne Road.  Mr &amp; Mrs Woodward</strong>.  Extensions to form new kitchen and utility rooms.<br />
    No objections.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>08/0207.  Field 414367, behind Lhingague, Surby Moar Road.  Carol Ann Williams.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Approval in Principle</strong> for erection of residential dwelling.<br />
    No objections.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Approvals</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>07/2111.  5 The Chase, Ballakillowey. Mr W Tindale</strong>. Erection of a conservatory on north west elevation and enclosure of front porch and additional window on front elevation.</p>
<p>Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer. Issued 28<sup>th</sup> January 2008.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>07/2244.  Walton Cottage, Ballakillowey.  Mr &amp; Mrs G Georgiou</strong>.  Alterations and erection of extensions (comprising an amendment to the development approved under 07/01440).   Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer.   Issued 29<sup>th</sup> January 2008.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>07/2108.  HIghfield, Howe Road, Port St Mary.  Mr &amp; Mrs D Gooberman</strong>.  Alterations and erection of extensions.  Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer.  Issued 4<sup>th</sup> February 2008.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>07/2328.  Field 414361, Surby Moar Road.  Mr N Kinley</strong>.  Re-location of approved horse shelter (07/1941).  Conditions include &ndash; 3. the shelter must be finished in dark brown or dark green materials.   Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer.  Issued 20<sup>th</sup> February 2008.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>07/2354.  Land adjacent to Glen View, Glen Chass.  Mr H W Harness</strong>. Change of use of land from agricultural to garden.  Conditions include &ndash; 3. notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (Permitted Development) Order 2005&hellip; no garage, garden shed, summer house, greenhouse, walling or fencing may be erected within the area edged red on the approved plan, without planning permission.  Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer.  Issued 21<sup>st</sup> February 2008.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>07/1979.  Greenhill, Ballagale Avenue, Surby.  Mr A J Lister</strong>.  Additional use of residential premised for the sale of home propagated plants.  Conditions include &ndash; 2.  This permission relates to the use of the premises as a residential dwelling with the operation of an outlet selling plants grown on the premises.  This business may only be open to visitors between 11am and 4pm on two days per week and between the start of May and end of August.  The business may be operated by Mr J Lister whilst he is resident at Greenhill, Ballagale Avenue.  Decision &ndash; Senior Planning Officer.  Issued &ndash; 13<sup>th</sup> February 2008.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Refusals</h3>
<p>none.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Planning Appeals</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>07/1350.part field 2368, Croit-e-Caley.  Hartford Homes Ltd.</strong>  Revision to approved dwelling (02/`097).   The appeal has been considered and the Minister concurs with the Inspector&rsquo;s conclusions and his recommendation that the appeal (by neighbours) should be dismissed. </p>
<h4>Inspector&rsquo;s Conclusions:</h4>
<blockquote>
<p>&lsquo;12.  There are a number of points that need to be made first.  I am urged to recommend refusal of the application and in effect require the height to be lowered.   Refusal of the permission would not achieve that.  It would then be a matter for the Planning Committee to decide whether to maintain the view expressed by officers that the increase in height was <em>de minimis</em> and that it was not expedient to take enforcement action.  It would also be open to the applicant to seek a Lawful Development Certificate.  Secondly, the cost of undoing what has been done without planning permission would only arise of enforcement action was taken and was successful.  However, I do recognise that if permission is given to this application that is the end of the matter since the increase in height would be lawful.    Consideration of any cost that might occur if permission is refused end enforcement action successfully taken plays no part in my assessment and recommendation.</p>
<p>13.  A numbers of references have been made to the previous appeal and the Inspector&rsquo;s comments.  It is my understanding that the appeal related to a landscape scheme and erection of a first floor extension over the single storey part of the approved dwelling.  His assessment about the impact of the increased size has to be seen in the context of that proposal which is quite different to that in this proposal.  His only comment about the approved scheme was that is did not confirm to the policy in its overall size and single-storey side extension.</p>
<p>14.  In this case the proposed and later amended modifications to fenestration are unexceptional.  The ground floor changes made no material difference to the dwelling.  The side windows on the front gabled extension are far enough away from adjoining properties so as not to give rise to unacceptable overlooking bearing in mind that the distances involved are greater than the acceptable minimum where there is a back to back relationship.  Here they are secondary side windows to a bedroom and of limited width.</p>
<p>15.  The changes to the size of the porch are bordering on the de minimum and in terms of the scale and mass of the building as perceived by the public of very limited impact.  Nor do they change the balance and appearance of the front elevation in any significant way.</p>
<p>16.  I now turn to the overall increase in height of 225 mm.  As the previous Inspector commented the approved size does not conform to planning policy.  Whatever the merits or otherwise of what has been given planning permission the increase of 225mm has to be seen in the context of what has permission and whether the impact is unacceptable in planning terms as an increase upon what is lawful.  It is a large house by any standards and I have some sympathy with the view that it is entirely out of keeping with the nearby dwellings in the settlement but it is lawful and that is the starting point.  In terms of a permitted ridge height of some 8.2m an increase of 225mm is insignificant in my judgement.  It is unlikely to be noticeable.  I appreciate that the increase of the single storey elements by a similar amount is a proportionately greater increase but, again, I do not find that a significant increase in terms of its impact on the outlook from Railway Cottage.  I conclude that what is already a large house will not appear significantly larger to the general public such that there is a legitimate planning objection.  In saying this I am mindful that the appellant and objectors are sensitised to the situation and they are likely to maintain their heightened perception.  This proposal is quite different to the scheme before the previous Inspector in its visual impact.</p>
<p>17.  In reaching my recommendation I have taken into account all other matters raised in writing but none are sufficient to outweigh the conclusions that lead to my recommendation.</p>
<p><strong>Recommendation</strong>: I recommend that the appeal be dismissed and the Planning Committee&rsquo;s decisions to grant conditional planning permission be upheld.<span class="endquote"></span></p>
<p>&mdash;Andrew D Kirby.  Inspector.</p>
</blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Other Planning Matters</h3>
<p>none.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Completion Certificates</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>07/7024.  Crinan, 41 Garth Avenue, Surby.  Mr P Allibone.</strong>  Formation of archway between kitchen and dining room.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Any Other Business</h3>
<p>none.</p>
</li>
<li>
<h3>Date of Next Meeting</h3>
<p>Wednesday 19<sup>th</sup> March.</p>
</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/02/27/minutes-wed-27th-feb-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winter Concert</title>
		<link>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/01/01/winter-concert/</link>
		<comments>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/01/01/winter-concert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Kelly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[concerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/01/01/winter-concert/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Winter Concert
Poster


Rushen Parish Commissioners invite you to come along and enjoy our Winter Concert. 7:30pm, Friday 25th January, Ballafesson Hall.
The entertainment will include Rushen Silver Band Juniors, various musical items and comedy acts!
The purpose of the concert is to raise funds for the Commissioner&#8217; Chartiy—The Thousla Cross Trust, which helps young people in the Parish.
Admission [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl class="figure right">
<dt><a title="Winter Concert 2008" href="http://rushen-commissioners.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/winter-concert-2008.jpg"><img src="http://rushen-commissioners.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/winter-concert-2008.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Winter Concert 2008" /></a></dt>
<dd>Winter Concert<br />
Poster</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Rushen Parish Commissioners invite you to come along and enjoy our Winter Concert. 7:30pm, Friday 25<sup>th</sup> January, Ballafesson Hall.</p>
<p>The entertainment will include Rushen Silver Band Juniors, various musical items and comedy acts!</p>
<p>The purpose of the concert is to raise funds for the Commissioner&#8217; Chartiy—<a title="Find out more about the Thousla Trust" href="http://rushen-commissioners.com/the-thousla-cross-trust/">The Thousla Cross Trust</a>, which helps young people in the Parish.</p>
<p class="highlight">Admission £3 including Tea &amp; Biscuits</p>
<p><a title="Get in touch" href="http://rushen-commissioners.com/contact/" target="_self">Contact Gill Kelly</a>, 834501</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rushen-commissioners.com/2008/01/01/winter-concert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
